Club Arnage

Club Arnage => General Discussion => Topic started by: nickliv on March 30, 2008, 09:36:00 pm



Title: DIRTY BOY
Post by: nickliv on March 30, 2008, 09:36:00 pm
Formula One Motor Racing Chief Max Mosley Sick Nazi Orgy With Five Hookers

Formula One Motor Racing's most powerful man, Max Mosley, plays a concentration camp commandant in a FIVE-HOUR torture chamber video.

Mosley is seen barking orders in German as he WHIPS two hookers dressed in striped uniforms reminiscent of AUSCHWITZ garb while girls in Nazi uniforms look on.

The shock report comes from News of the World, which claims to have the video (appearing below) of Mosley.

It claims the multi-millionaire son of alleged Adolf Hitler sympathizer, Sir Oswald Mosley, engaged in unthinkable against with the British femme fatales.

Video: Watch F1 boss Max Mosley play Nazi sex games with hookers Warning: This video is not suitable for children.  They should be removed from the room immediately before viewing this video.

At one point the wrinkled 67-year-old—who publicly likes to give the impression he has put his father's evil legacy behind him—yells "she needs more of ze punishment!" while brandishing a LEATHER STRAP over a brunette's naked bottom.

Then the lashes rain down as Mosley counts them out in German: "Eins! Zwei! Drei! Vier! Fünf! Sechs!"  In the midst of one beating, a panting Max Mosley watches one hooker take off her Nazi uniform.

Before hammering away at the girls he plays a cowering death camp inmate himself, having his GENITALS inspected and his hair searched for head LICE.

Then, head bowed and tied up in chains, he is interrogated by a dominatrix before being chained up and LASHED so hard over a TORTURE BENCH that he WHIMPERS for mercy and has to have a wound dressing put on his backside.

The incident was bound to send shockwaves throughout most of Europe.

The NOTW reports that last month the urbane president of the FIA—Formula One's governing body—hit the headlines when he announced a crackdown on racism in the sport after McLaren ace Lewis Hamilton was abused by Spanish spectators.

But on Friday the only ‘crackdowns' married Mosley was interested in were on bare buttocks...including his own.

Max Mosely currently serving his fourth term as president of the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA), a non-profit association that represents the interests of motoring organisations and motor car users worldwide. The FIA is also the governing body for Formula One and other international motor sports.

From an early age Mosley was involved in politics; in his teens he arranged social activities for the Union Movement (UM), his father's post-war party, and was later a prospective UM parliamentary candidate. However, the association of his surname with Fascism has stopped him from developing his interest in politics further.

During Mosley’s Presidency of the FIA there have been several controversial events that have often generated criticism and calls for him to resign. Of the criticism aimed at him Mosley has said: "I don’t mind flak – I come from a family where we have had flak all our lives – but I realise some people do. I love reading the blogs when they are being furious about me, it’s very entertaining, and there is the odd one which defends me. But F1 simply cannot divorce itself from the zeitgeist." Mosley and the FIA have been accused on several occasions in recent years by British journalists and Formula One team owners of favouring the Ferrari team through their judgements.  Mosley himself believes that "the line in the UK is – how could you be so beastly to [British team] McLaren? And the line on the continent is – you favour McLaren and [their driver] Hamilton, or you’re trying to make sure a Brit wins the championship."


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Andy Zarse on March 30, 2008, 10:07:43 pm
This surely must be made up, a satiraical skit? If not, then it's just a shame J-MB died before he was able to read about this. Maybe he died laughing?


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: geoffd on March 30, 2008, 10:16:52 pm
Well we will see,  if Max gets mad (pardon the pun) and it goes to court then the NOTW will get slaughtered, and Max will endup v richer.  If it all stays quiet then it might well be true...

Lets see what happens in the next few days....


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: nickliv on March 30, 2008, 10:28:45 pm
Andy

NOT screws link here

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/3003_nazi_orgy.shtml


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Chris24 on March 31, 2008, 03:35:28 am
So long as it doesn't interfer with his job (not that I agree with the way the FIA (F##ked It Again) is run anyway !)

What he likes to do in his own time is surely HIS own business. I can't see that he has broken any laws so if he likes to dress up as a German and get his bottom spanked by 5 hookers then so be it.

Who are we to judge ? I am sure there are people on here with dirty desires that either haven't got the bottle to act on them or the money to make them happen. Max Mosley obviously has the means to do so however. ::)


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Nordic on March 31, 2008, 08:32:09 am
pissed myself, Chris is right maybe he has not broken any laws, but given his family connection to the Fascist party, maybe not in the best possible taste and I doubt it will play well with the movers and shakers in F1.

btw I bet Ron Dennis has a huge grin on his face this morning!


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: oldtimer on March 31, 2008, 10:25:48 am
I can't see that he has broken any laws

I thought purchasing the services of a prostitute - or in this case several - was against the law or am I mistaken in that assumption?


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Fran on March 31, 2008, 10:41:19 am
I thought purchasing the services of a prostitute - or in this case several - was against the law or am I mistaken in that assumption?

I think there are "technicalities" about how you pay for it, ie. offering a "gift" rather than "paying for sex".   

An even dodgier area of law is that even between consenting adults this can be considered assault!

Not that I know much about it at all .... I just read it somewhere  :angel:

F


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: chop456 on March 31, 2008, 11:42:15 am
btw I bet Ron Dennis has a huge grin on his face this morning!

Jackie Stewart, too.  ;D


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Andy Zarse on March 31, 2008, 12:15:20 pm
btw I bet Ron Dennis has a huge grin on his face this morning!

Jackie Stewart, too.  ;D

I'll bet he bloody is!  :D Now who's the sad 1930's music hall act, eh?

Formula One was having trouble
What a sad, sad story
Needed a new leader to restore
Its former glory
Where, oh, where was he?
Where could that man be?
We looked around
And then we found
The man for you and me -

LEAD TENOR STORMTROOPER:

And now it's...

Springtime,
For Moseley and the FIA,
Doop-ee-doop-doop!

etc etc

(http://www.pbs.org/wnet/broadway/stars/images/brooks_m_pic2.jpg)

It's priceless, and summary dismissal, sorry I mean early retirement, awaits. Nobody can take him seriously amymore surely to God? Martin's pitlane walks will never be the same again.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: nickliv on March 31, 2008, 12:22:50 pm
MORE NEWS JUST IN.........

RON DENNIS RUSHED TO HOSPITAL!!!!!!

Early sources report that he suffering from several hernias and stomach ruptures caused by excessive chest movement. Also he's suffering from severe dehydration caused by repeated urination and crying.

The ambulance driver said;
"Somethings made him laugh so much he's ruptured himself. All the time in ambulance he just couldn't stop laughing, he just couldn't stop. We had to put him on drip due the excessive crying and urination. He just couldn't stop, the horror, the horror...."

The doctors have confirmed Mr Dennis condition but have stated he should make a complete recovery as long as no one shows him The News Of The World again.......


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: nickliv on March 31, 2008, 12:25:58 pm
They say a little of what you fancy does you good.

But it's f**ked up Max Mosely good and proper


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: nickliv on March 31, 2008, 12:30:11 pm
He might be embarrassed, but then again maybe he'll get wood from the humiliation of it all.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Andy Zarse on March 31, 2008, 12:49:45 pm
So long as it doesn't interfer with his job (not that I agree with the way the FIA (F##ked It Again) is run anyway !)

What he likes to do in his own time is surely HIS own business. I can't see that he has broken any laws so if he likes to dress up as a German and get his bottom spanked by 5 hookers then so be it.

Who are we to judge ? I am sure there are people on here with dirty desires that either haven't got the bottle to act on them or the money to make them happen. Max Mosley obviously has the means to do so however. ::)

Chris, you have got to be joking, your view seems totally naive, sorry. To my mind it's an utter disgrace, the nasty bastard ought to be locked up.

Seriously, if you're into getting whipped for kicks, that is fair enough. I don't see it myself but there you go. However, to get some kind of kick out of play acting one of the most evil, depraved, hateful deeds of all time is beyond the pale. No sane or decent person should do that. I reckon that dressing as a Nazi stromtrooper and beating a woman dressed as a concentration camp victim with a stick whilst barking in German, or playing the concentration camp victim and being inspected for pubic lice (even ignorring that your father was the senior British Fascist organiser), might just qualify as anti-semitic. You'd certainly need a completely sick and depraved mind to enjoy that. I can't see how this is different from holocaust denial, indeed it's probably worse; the man is a sociopath. Fit to run the FIA? The nasty little c**t isn't fit to run a bloody fish and chip shop.

Oh and compare and contrast his words with the Kick Racism Out of F1 after the recent Spanish/Hamilton fiasco. Hypocrisy.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: oldtimer on March 31, 2008, 01:18:28 pm
So long as it doesn't interfer with his job (not that I agree with the way the FIA (F##ked It Again) is run anyway !)

I am sure there are people on here with dirty desires that either haven't got the bottle to act on them

Hope we are not meant to admire him for "having the bottle" to arrange for this nasty fantasy to be enacted...


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Nordic on March 31, 2008, 03:41:04 pm
To be honest I did not believe it at first, and thought he would be looking for a huge payout. But it seems to be true. Aside from the obvious Stewart and Dennis glee at his postion, it must now be time for him to go. Todt has a bit of spare time now, or maybe flav or ron himself.I think it would be good if someone else maybe not so close to f1 hopefully should step up and, if you pardon the phrase, be bernies next whipping boy.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: termietermite on March 31, 2008, 04:11:21 pm
Perfectly put, AZ.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Leftie on March 31, 2008, 10:12:47 pm
So long as it doesn't interfer with his job (not that I agree with the way the FIA (F##ked It Again) is run anyway !)

What he likes to do in his own time is surely HIS own business. I can't see that he has broken any laws so if he likes to dress up as a German and get his bottom spanked by 5 hookers then so be it.

Who are we to judge ? I am sure there are people on here with dirty desires that either haven't got the bottle to act on them or the money to make them happen. Max Mosley obviously has the means to do so however. ::)

Chris, you have got to be joking, your view seems totally naive, sorry. To my mind it's an utter disgrace, the nasty bastard ought to be locked up.

Seriously, if you're into getting whipped for kicks, that is fair enough. I don't see it myself but there you go. However, to get some kind of kick out of play acting one of the most evil, depraved, hateful deeds of all time is beyond the pale. No sane or decent person should do that. I reckon that dressing as a Nazi stromtrooper and beating a woman dressed as a concentration camp victim with a stick whilst barking in German, or playing the concentration camp victim and being inspected for pubic lice (even ignorring that your father was the senior British Fascist organiser), might just qualify as anti-semitic. You'd certainly need a completely sick and depraved mind to enjoy that. I can't see how this is different from holocaust denial, indeed it's probably worse; the man is a sociopath. Fit to run the FIA? The nasty little c**t isn't fit to run a bloody fish and chip shop.

Oh and compare and contrast his words with the Kick Racism Out of F1 after the recent Spanish/Hamilton fiasco. Hypocrisy.

Andy, I agree with you.

His 'alledged' father was a Marxist sadist and by defination a racist. His actions on this subject sugest a similar mindset.

However, his private life is of no concern to us.

That is UNTILL IT BECOMES PUBLIC. And may therefore impinge in our sport.

Everyone has their private ways on gaining satisfaction sexually or otherwise. Some of us may even video those ways for their own satisfaction. But to place these 'desires and actions' in the public domain is gross irresponsibility, and any person doing such a thing should not be in control of a global business where their 'visual' actions of personal depravity seems to be the strictured control of a media extravenganza such as motor sport.

Can all the descisions over his presidency be biased by his 'personal preferences'?


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: pool pugilist on March 31, 2008, 10:20:26 pm
What an absoulute tw*t, its amazing how many times monied/persons of great responsibility get caught like this, what is their problem? seems to me they have got to get the ultimate kick all the time ???As for his choice of fulfillment, well that is just beyond words!! :-[ :-[

Bye Bye Max, we look forward to your excuses!! :laugh: :laugh:


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Chris24 on March 31, 2008, 10:51:14 pm
Andy, I am certainly not condoning his choice of role play and as you say yes he is a sick bastard if that is what turns him on. I am neither rich or in a position of power like he is so have no idea how his mind works.
But was making the point that its his business. Not sure how it managed to get taped and leaked so fast, but I guess its not down to him.

Yes i know prostitution is illegal in this country but its not in places like Holland, so I don't really call what he has done a major crime. What I meant was that its not like he gets his kicks out of kiddie fiddling etc, which I would have issues with.

But I don't think that things should effect his job whether he enjoys dressing as a German or f##king midgets, or whatever turns him on. His personal life shouldn't have anything to do with his job.

Though I do think it would be funny if someone offered him a cushion during the next FIA meeting , to soften the seat for his whipped arse! LOL !

Made me chuckle when you said that that sort of thing doesn't do it for you, baring in mind that you travel to Le Mans with your own personal GIMP. LOL ! ;D


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Leftie on March 31, 2008, 11:16:46 pm
Chris, the GIMP is a persona. Yes the GIMP has been filmed etc. But can you see the face?

Has the GIMP done anything that could be termed as;-

Racist, demeaning, discusting, 'perverted' (I reserve judgement), etc.

However, has the GIMP evolved into what we see now through a sheltered childhood to an LM legend?

Not quite the same as MR.M is it? particulary with the alledged family history.

Everyone has fantasies and foibles after all.

Long live the GIMP


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Chris24 on March 31, 2008, 11:24:17 pm
Still like the story of them turning up at the French toll booths with him sat there in his posing pouch with the gimp mask on and having him hand over the money to the attendant. Class ! I would have loved to see the attendants reaction.  ;D


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Perdu on April 01, 2008, 12:13:17 am
Ah now here's one

Is the GIMP really STIG?

Is there really a STIG?

I know there's a GIMP, oi seen 'im!


moi brayne urts


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Andy Zarse on April 01, 2008, 12:58:04 pm
I saw the Gimp last night. He tells me his new fantasy involves pretending to be the '03 winning Bentley; he "comes in to the pits" and green overall clad dominatrixes crawl over him "cleaning his windscreen" and "changing his tyres". He is then beaten senseless with chamois leathers by fat women dressed up as Dindo Capello and Reinhold Joest before being sent back out for another "double stint", before finally "taking the chequered flag".

Say what you like, but whilst the Bentley Motor Co might not be too pleased, this really can't upset anyone and I'd agree it's private. Max's fantasy on the other hand is deeply offensive to many communities around the world and as such brings the good name of the FIA and motorsport in general, into huge disrepute. I see Bernie has now withdrawn his unconditional support; he's f**ked.

From The Times today;

Bernie Ecclestone, the billionaire boss of Formula One, said last night that he did not believe it would be appropriate for Max Mosley to attend this weekend’s Bahrain Grand Prix after the lurid revelations of Mr Mosley’s part in an alleged Nazi-style orgy with five prostitutes.

Mr Ecclestone, a long-time friend of Mr Mosley . . . said Mr Mosley’s presence would distract from the race and would not be appreciated by the Bahraini Royal Family.

“He shouldn’t go, should he? The problem is he would take all the ink away from the race and put it on something which, honestly and truly, is nobody else’s business anyway,” Mr Ecclestone said. Asked how the Royal Family might react to Mr Mosley’s presence, Mr Ecclestone said: “They wouldn’t like it.”

. . . Despite suggesting that he should not travel to the Gulf, Mr Ecclestone . . . said he would not be calling for Mr Mosley to resign. “What Max should do is what he thinks is right because it is only him that’s involved, not the FIA,” said Mr Ecclestone. “He must do what he believes, in his heart of hearts, is the right thing.”

Mr Ecclestone admitted that many would find the disclosures of Mr Mosley’s personal conduct hard to understand. “If Max was in bed with two hookers, they’d say ‘good for you or something like that’,” Mr Ecclestone said. “But this, as it is, people find it replusive. I think that’s the problem.”

Mr Ecclestone believes his friend and business associate will get nowhere in the courts and, taking action will only give the story further publicity. “The trouble with Max is he’s been brave and there is bravado at the moment, but I don’t think it’s going to be easy. And if he starts to sue, from what I understand, the chances of him winning would be slim and, the trouble is, it’s just a lot more ink for the press.”




Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Steve Pyro on April 01, 2008, 01:18:51 pm
This from The Times Online "Max Mosley faces calls to quit as Formula One chief after ‘Nazi’ orgy"

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/formula_1/article3649197.ece (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/formula_1/article3649197.ece)


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Christopher on April 01, 2008, 01:22:02 pm

And this from Autosport........

Mosley not planning to step down

Max Mosley has no intention of stepping down from his position as FIA president, autosport.com has learned, despite the controversy caused by his sexual exploits being revealed in a British tabloid newspaper

A News of the World frontpage story, which reported Mosley had taken part in a 'sadomasochistic orgy' with five prostitutes, has prompted widespread coverage and led some to call for his resignation.

Former world champion Jody Scheckter told The Guardian on Tuesday: "There is absolutely no question in my mind that Mosley should resign.

"From a purely motor racing point of view you can't have somebody like this running the sport or any other sport come to that. I really think he ought to go and I would like to see the press having a concerted campaign to persuade him to do just that."

However, sources close to Mosley have confirmed that he has every intention of continuing in his role, as he continues discussions with his lawyers regarding the News of the World article.

The widespread media coverage that the article has caused, however, could yet result in Mosley cancelling a planned trip to this weekend's Bahrain Grand Prix.

He was scheduled to attend the event and a function with the Bahraini Royal Family, but may choose to not travel there to avoid any potential embarrassment for anyone there.

An FIA spokesman told autosport.com that no decision had been taken yet.

"We understand that Mr Mosley had originally planned to attend Bahrain but is currently unavailable due to consultation with lawyers, and we cannot confirm his plans," said the spokesman.

Formula One supremo Bernie Ecclestone has suggested, however, that it would perhaps be best if Mosley did not attend the race.

Speaking to The Times, Ecclestone said: "He shouldn't go, should he? The problem is he would take all the ink away from the race and put it on something which, honestly and truly, is nobody else's business anyway,"

When asked about whether or not Mosley should resign over the matter, Ecclestone said: "What Max should do is what he thinks is right because it is only him that's involved, not the FIA. He must do what he believes, in his heart of hearts, is the right thing."



Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: smokie on April 01, 2008, 01:51:39 pm
I thought Max wasn't usually at the races anyway - I remember Martin Brundle making that point a few years back when his judgement was required a couple of times and he wasn't there. I guess he picks and chooses which ones he attends.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Piglet on April 01, 2008, 03:03:47 pm

His 'alledged' father was a Marxist sadist and by defination a racist. His actions on this subject sugest a similar mindset.

Just as a point of history, there is nothing "alleged" about Sir Oswald's views, (I'm assuming that's what you meant was alleged, I'm not aware there was any doubt as to him being Max's father?), his views were very clear and he and his second wife (Max's mother, Diana Mitford), defending his (and their) views throughout their lives.  Diana's obituary in the times in 2003 was headed the "Unrepentant Nazi".   

The point is that sometimes it is possible to excuse someone's views by having to see them at a point and time in the past to understand their context. 

I find it hard to believe that someone in a position of power can survive a scandal like this, but as MM doesn't appear to answer to anyone who is going to sack him if he doesn't do the decent thing himself?


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: monkey on April 01, 2008, 03:13:14 pm
I have to say Mr Zarse I do find myself in agreement with your stance.

Interesting do you not think that the comment below perhaps provides an indication of the depths to which Mr E is prepared to lower his ‘plumb’ before he ‘strikes the bottom’:

‘Mr Ecclestone admitted that many would find the disclosures of Mr Mosley’s personal conduct hard to understand. “If Max was in bed with two hookers, they’d say ‘good for you……………..’

 ;D


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: monkey on April 01, 2008, 04:49:57 pm
He has a house in Buckinghamshire.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Lorry on April 01, 2008, 10:06:36 pm
I don't think any Judge would convict on the basis that it was probably their turn next


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Lord Pig-Pen on April 01, 2008, 10:16:13 pm
I don't think any Judge would convict on the basis that it was probably their turn next
Has the video been leaked yet?


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Bob U on April 01, 2008, 10:35:35 pm
Don't know if it is genuine.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e32-sp2yZOw


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: nickliv on April 01, 2008, 11:54:48 pm
I don't think any Judge would convict on the basis that it was probably their turn next
Has the video been leaked yet?

Leaked? choose your words more carefully PP ;D


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Dangermouse on April 02, 2008, 01:32:29 am
Personally, I think he should go.
But I reckon what he did is also his own business and nowt to do with anyone else.
AND...............why oh why oh why..............do all these rich, overpaid, pampered feckers insist on videoing themselves......or allowing someone else to do it?
It seems that footballers etc etc, and MM are on such an ego trip that they WANT us to know.
He should go, if only for his stupity or vanity.........and can I tell him, he could have done this every week for the last ten years but have insisted on no cameras and videos and he'll have kept his job.
Their is no substitute for stupidity!

Go Max, just go


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Rhino on April 02, 2008, 04:23:26 am
He should definetly go. It's a case of power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. Should be a limit to how long they can be in charge for. Seems whenever people in power go past a third term they go power mad, believing they are always right.
I would like to see him take NOTW to court, they probably have even more on him we should hear about, and it's a new's corporation which owns the Times whith whom he is suining Martin Brundle.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Christopher on April 02, 2008, 08:31:33 am

It would seem he is not planning on going.......


Mosley apologises and vows to stay

Max Mosley has apologised to members of the FIA for any embarrassment caused by the recent revelations about his private life, but made it clear he remains fully committed to his role as president of motor racing's governing body.

In a letter sent on Tuesday to all presidents of the national FIA clubs, all members of the FIA Senate, the World Motor Sport Council and the World Council for Mobility and the Automobile, Mosley blames the allegations about his sexual conduct on a 'covert' operation to discredit him.

The FIA head also denied claims from the newspaper that there were Nazi connotations in his actions.

He also reveals that he intends to take legal action against the News of the World newspaper for the article.

In the letter, Mosley writes: "From information provided to me by an impeccable high-level source close to the UK police and security services, I understand that over the last two weeks or so, a covert investigation of my private life and background has been undertaken by a group specialising in such things, for reasons and clients as yet unknown. I have had similar but less well-sourced information from France.

"Regrettably you are now familiar with the results of this covert investigation and I am very sorry if this has embarrassed you or the club. Not content with publicising highly personal and private activities, which are, to say the least, embarrassing, a British tabloid newspaper published the story with the claim that there was some sort of Nazi connotation to the matter. This is entirely false.

"It is against the law in most countries to publish details of a person's private life without good reason. The publications by The News of the World are a wholly unwarranted invasion of my privacy and I intend to issue legal proceedings against the Newspaper in the UK and other jurisdictions."

Although there have been calls by some for Mosley to resign in the wake of the scandal, in the letter he claims that he has received support from a number of parties who wish him to stand firm in light of the controversy.

"I have received a very large number of messages of sympathy and support from those within the FIA and the motor sport and motoring communities generally, suggesting that my private life is not relevant to my work and that I should continue in my role," wrote Mosley. "I am grateful and with your support I intend to follow this advice.

"I shall now devote some time to those responsible for putting this into the public domain but above all I need to repair the damage to my immediate family who are the innocent and unsuspecting victims of this deliberate and calculated personal attack.

"You can, however be certain that I will not allow any of this to impede my commitment to the work of the FIA."

The letter is the first public statement from Mosley since the story broke in Sunday's News of the World newspaper.

Although Mosley is scheduled to attend this weekend's Bahrain Grand Prix, it is looking increasingly likely that he will choose to skip the event.

Although the news of Mosley's antics has generated a lot of coverage and reaction in the media, so far Formula One teams and manufacturers have remained silent over the matter.





Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: nickliv on April 02, 2008, 06:23:20 pm
(http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/images/homepage/3003_orgy_06.jpg)

I'm going to give you a brain and a penis, but only enough blood to run one at a time


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Nordic on April 02, 2008, 06:34:13 pm
Quote
In the letter, Mosley writes: "From information provided to me by an impeccable high-level source close to the UK police and security services, I understand that over the last two weeks or so, a covert investigation of my private life and background has been undertaken by a group specialising in such things, for reasons and clients as yet unknown. I have had similar but less well-sourced information from France.

Is he suggesting that its all someones fault that he was filmed dressed as a nazi etc. can't be long until he suggests it was all McLarens fault.

f**k*ng crazy, the man is a cretin and should now retire from public life or better still if the FIA had any balls they should sack him.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: DelBoy on April 02, 2008, 06:53:11 pm

I'm going to give you a brain and a penis, but only enough blood to run one at a time

Plagiarist  :police: :police:

....but it makes a good caption   ;D ;D

Del


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Nordic on April 03, 2008, 04:19:46 pm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/7328018.stm

The pressure is mounting on him to go.

Quote
Mosley said in a statement: "Given the history of BMW and Mercedes-Benz, particularly before and during the Second World War, I fully understand why they would wish to strongly distance themselves from what they rightly describe as the disgraceful content of these publications.

bit of a cheap shot by the guy I think.

A imagine the last thing anyone wants is Mosley Goosesteping up the grid with a 1/2 dressed girl on each arm, not just Merc and BMW.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Stu on April 03, 2008, 11:44:45 pm


The FIA head also denied claims from the newspaper that there were Nazi connotations in his actions.


In the letter, Mosley writes:

"Regrettably you are now familiar with the results of this covert investigation and I am very sorry if this has embarrassed you or the club. Not content with publicising highly personal and private activities, which are, to say the least, embarrassing, a British tabloid newspaper published the story with the claim that there was some sort of Nazi connotation to the matter. This is entirely false.



Looks like him in the photos and it looks like concentration camp type clothes the girl is wearing. Blokes a complete and utter handjob.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Andy Zarse on April 04, 2008, 01:44:09 am
Stu, where you been you owld get?

Thought we'd all enjoy this one!

(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q227/portisheaddave/cheerslads.jpg)


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Lorry on April 05, 2008, 12:53:30 am
Apparently he's denying it all and suing the News of the Screws.

I didn't watch the video, but the stills looked convincing, allegedly.

Of course its an invasion of privacy and the result of a witch-hunt


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Andy Zarse on April 05, 2008, 10:45:47 am
From a meeting of the FIA when McLaren were in the dock-

Ian Mill:

"I have two points.
The first is a matter that we did raise in our skeleton submissions: it concerns the Italian documents, if I may refer to them as such, which you have received and which form part of the evidence against us. You will have read in our submissions that we have concerns that those documents may have obtained improperly. We have present, in the room, if deemed helpful and relevant, our Italian lawyer, Professor Amodio, who can explain the issues to you.".....

Max Mosley:

"In front of us is a list of 323 text messages and telephone calls – a combination of the two – over a 3.5 month period. The World Council’s only concern is whether that list is accurate and truthful. We are not concerned with whether there are issues over how that is obtained. Unless there isevidence that it is forged or inaccurate, we will take it on its face value."


The sound of somebody being hoisted by his own petard?


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Steve Pyro on April 05, 2008, 10:57:00 am

The sound of somebody being hoisted by his own petard?


Maybe he's in to that kind of service?



Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Andy Zarse on April 05, 2008, 11:18:16 am
liable

Peter I let you off first time but you've gone and done it again and must therefore be punished and humiliated like a very bad boy!

Durghh! It's not "liable", it's "libel"! ;)


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Nordic on April 05, 2008, 04:49:26 pm
I think the Sunday Times may have more suprises in store for Max on the 6th, maybe to do with his income.

It's also highly likey the Screws of the World will have more to tell as well.

If he hangs on beyond the end of April it will be amazing.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Lorry on April 05, 2008, 10:32:27 pm
I think the Sunday Times may have more suprises in store for Max on the 6th, maybe to do with his income.....
What income?  He works for the FIA for free, and can still afford hookers by the bunch.  I must be in the wrong job


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Ade on April 05, 2008, 10:45:56 pm
This makes interesting reading - don't know how much is true: http://www.sportspromedia.com/mosley.htm (http://www.sportspromedia.com/mosley.htm)

Ade


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Leftie on April 05, 2008, 11:58:53 pm
This makes interesting reading - don't know how much is true: http://www.sportspromedia.com/mosley.htm (http://www.sportspromedia.com/mosley.htm)

Ade

Ade, many thanks for that article.

Illuminating to say the least.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Nordic on April 06, 2008, 09:23:48 am
I think the Sunday Times may have more suprises in store for Max on the 6th, maybe to do with his income.

It's also highly likey the Screws of the World will have more to tell as well.

If he hangs on beyond the end of April it will be amazing.

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/0604_mosley.shtml

The latest......


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Andy Zarse on April 06, 2008, 03:26:27 pm
Apparently he had his arse shaved and a thermometer shoved up his anus whilst tied up bent naked over the desk. Still that's nothing to be ashamed about or a reason to resign, is it?


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: DelBoy on April 06, 2008, 03:43:01 pm
There's thermometers and thermometers.  Perhaps it was one of these   :'( :'(

Del

(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a266/delboy9/Thermometer.jpg)


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Fran on April 06, 2008, 03:46:10 pm
I loved the grid interview with MB and Eric Clapton re. practising his waving the chequered flag technique..

EC:  Is that double handed or single?
MB:  Ah well thats very topical at the moment.  I would just get down on one knee and go for it!

LMAO  ;D

F


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Lorry on April 06, 2008, 10:56:06 pm
Apparently he had his arse shaved and a thermometer shoved up his anus whilst tied up bent naked over the desk. Still that's nothing to be ashamed about or a reason to resign, is it?
Now it all makes sense.  They did that to Syd James in a Carry On film, (except with a daffodil) ;D ;D ;D

I love the quote from the Hooker "We were only following orders," said our informant :police: ;D ;D ;D

Whats left of his career must be down to hours rather than days


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Lord Pig-Pen on April 06, 2008, 11:26:47 pm
Apparently he had his arse shaved and a thermometer shoved up his anus whilst tied up bent naked over the desk. Still that's nothing to be ashamed about or a reason to resign, is it?
End of the line one thinks... at least he has endured the team Zarse initiation ;)


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Andy Zarse on April 06, 2008, 11:51:33 pm
Apparently he had his arse shaved and a thermometer shoved up his anus whilst tied up bent naked over the desk. Still that's nothing to be ashamed about or a reason to resign, is it?
Now it all makes sense.  They did that to Syd James in a Carry On film, (except with a daffodil) ;D ;D ;D


Lorry, sorry to be a pedant but I think the daffodil/bottom thing could have been Frankie Howerd in Carry On Doctor, and not Syd James? And like Max, Howerd was "one of them" as well. Ooooh Matron, no....


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Lorry on April 07, 2008, 11:01:27 am
I got the daffodil part right


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: nickliv on April 07, 2008, 12:35:39 pm
reading the article in the NOTW yesterday, the newspaper is making sure that the FiA officials are fully briefed on the matter and have sent each member their own personal video and transcript copy of the sessions with the ladies.

Of course Max has his own copies and watches the highlights later, maybe James Allen provides the commentary, or is that a bit too far :laugh:

Stop the cock. Sounds like good advice ;)


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Andy Zarse on April 07, 2008, 06:51:51 pm
I got the daffodil part right

Lorry I've done you a slight diservice. In a way we were both right. The daffodil scene was originally in Carry On Nurse (1959). To critical acclaim, rather than the expected thermometer, daffodils were inserted into the rectum of Wilfred Hyde-White who playing an over-demanding patient.

Carry On Doctor (1967), starring Frankie Howerd, contains a sly reference to that daffodil/thermometer scene. When a nurse approaches Francis Bigger (Howerd) with a daffodil, he says, "Oh no you don't! I saw that film!"

Comic genius, but it won't help Max get off the hook. Actually, having seen the video, I think he'd quite enjoy the hook.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: oldtimer on April 07, 2008, 07:03:21 pm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/painoflaughter/pip/2c8ww/

Andy, I think you will enjoy this...

Enjoy  ;D


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: oldtimer on April 07, 2008, 07:08:00 pm
In Andy's defence (on some of it anyway)

Frankie was born Howard, but was known professionally (don't know why) as Howerd...


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: smokie on April 07, 2008, 08:00:34 pm
I hope this forum isn't dissolving into a den of pedantry...  ::)


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Leftie on April 08, 2008, 12:33:37 am
I hope this forum isn't dissolving into a den of pedantry...  ::)

How about 'Iniquity'


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Andy Zarse on April 08, 2008, 02:20:36 am
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/painoflaughter/pip/2c8ww/

Andy, I think you will enjoy this...

Enjoy  ;D

Thanks for the heads up, I shall listen to that as i should be in the car around that time.

Have you been following this series? http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/frankiehowerdratheryouthanme/

The play detailing Tony Hancock's affair with John Le Meseurier's (sp?) wife was most touching and brilliantly acted. Wednesdays episode with Francis Howerd (Peter; note spelling!) looks very good, should be interesting to see how David Walliams copes with playing Howerd, he certainly looks the part, oh no yes missus.

Appropos of nowt, Kenneth Horne went to my school. He was above me though, I was about seven when he died!


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: oldtimer on April 08, 2008, 10:06:19 am
Thanks Andy.  Yes I have watched them all so far.  They have been brilliant.  Look forwerd ( ;D) to Wednesday's offering.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: nickliv on April 08, 2008, 11:22:35 am
This series is one of the few things I make an effort to catch. The Steptoe, and the Hancock ones were particular triumphs.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Kpy on April 08, 2008, 03:24:17 pm
This may amuse, or demonstrate the esteem in which Max is currently held .........................
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZI3qpSO0Im4


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Leftie on April 09, 2008, 01:31:07 am
This may amuse, or demonstrate the esteem in which Max is currently held .........................
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZI3qpSO0Im4

Kpy,

Didnt understand the link there as it seems to be about the presidentials.

BTW, is that a 'Sud Sport' in your avatar? Is it still going?


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: chop456 on April 09, 2008, 11:05:32 am
A top rate Max-smashing by Paul Stoddart.

http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpass_feature_item.php?fes_art_id=34439

"Sadistic maniac..."  ;D


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Bob U on April 09, 2008, 11:24:52 am
"Secret, sadomasochist Sex pervert"    Like it.

Not so secret now Max is it?

As Basil Fawlty says " Don't mention the whore" sorry I meant war


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Fran on April 09, 2008, 12:22:33 pm
anyone for a spanking until their bum bleeds :P

Only if I can be the spanker not the spankee - and if I can choose whose bum gets whupped  (wrinkly old nazis need not apply)!   >:D

F


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Fran on April 09, 2008, 12:49:03 pm
not sure if one the regulars would want to the that.

Eh?!  ???  Trembly fingers there FS?


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Nordic on April 09, 2008, 12:57:52 pm
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/videoplayer/index.php?videoid=http://del.interoute.com/?id=3f9dc955-a403-41e1-9ccf-32bd3317bb60&delivery=stream

The Video is now back up following the court case.

pmsl ;D


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Nordic on April 09, 2008, 04:17:26 pm
Max will face a vote of confidence 3rd of June in Paris to decide his future.

For fucks sake, can't they meet any sooner to get rid of the cretin. By then I expect Bernie will have applied pressure and saved his mates arse.


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Bob U on April 09, 2008, 04:34:02 pm
. By then I expect Bernie will have applied pressure and saved his mates arse.

Would that be a pressure bandage after it was whippped ;D


Your right, by then the dust will have settled on this one and no
doubt something else will have cropped up in F1 to take to take 
the interest away from Max's misdemeanures.
 


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Andy Zarse on April 09, 2008, 11:03:33 pm
Thanks Andy.  Yes I have watched them all so far.  They have been brilliant.  Look forwerd ( ;D) to Wednesday's offering.

Hmmm, I don't know about you, even though I though Walliams was pretty good as Howerd, generally there was a bit too much gay bumming and cocoa shunting in it for my personal taste.  :-[


Title: Re: DIRTY BOY
Post by: Lorry on April 12, 2008, 11:50:12 pm
Whats the difference between Mugabe and Mosley.  Max admits he's been beaten