Author Topic: Panoz....  (Read 3440 times)

Offline Ruptured Duck Motorsport

  • CA Veteran
  • Club Arnage God
  • ******
  • Posts: 1140
    • View Profile
Panoz....
« on: April 28, 2004, 04:20:10 pm »
Any ideas what engine the Panoz is running?  Does it have the same noise level as the first couple of years it ran at LM?
Scarred old slaver know he’s doin’ alright.

Offline Abs

  • CA Veteran
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
  • Boys at TVR do it again!
    • View Profile
Re:Panoz....
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2004, 04:22:33 pm »
Does it have the same noise level as the first couple of years it ran at LM?

Let's hope so!!
Any married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people
remembering the same thing

Offline jpchenet

  • CA Veteran
  • Club Arnage Master
  • *******
  • Posts: 4516
    • View Profile
Re:Panoz....
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2004, 05:08:36 pm »
It was certainly "growling" round during PQ and was distinctive above all the other cars (with the Corvettes quite close behind)

Running a 6 Litre engine this year!

http://www.lemans.org/univers_sport/24hauto/live/team/ifc/011_index_gb.html

rcutler

  • Guest
Re:Panoz....
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2004, 05:40:10 pm »
I think that in 98 the panoz was running an 8 litre v10 but do not quote me on that

Offline Matt Harper

  • CA Veteran
  • Club Arnage God
  • ******
  • Posts: 1257
    • View Profile
Re:Panoz....
« Reply #4 on: April 28, 2004, 05:43:43 pm »
Panoz has utilised a couple of V8 configurations.
I believe the early racing coupe had a Roush (Ford) of 5.8 litres displacement.
Current V8 is a Hendrick prepared and significantly modified (for durability) NASCAR motor (pushrod and distributor, but fuel injected, rather than Holley equipped).
Corvette runs very trusty 7 litre (427ci) all-aluminium ZLT6 - again with OHV. Simple, durable, lightweight and powerful - all good ingredients for an enduro. Their 6 speed Hewland transaxle will make a difference - but most of the gains on last year have come from their new Michelins. I figured a very close match with Prodrive. However pre-qual times that are 5 sec per lap quicker than the 550 suggests that, unless they run into unforseen mechanicals (which is quite rare these days) they will run away with GTS, which is a bit of a shame, as the rest of the race is shaping-up to be a bit of a foregone conclusion aswell. I did notice that the 'vettes put in more laps than anyone else, however - anyone who attended know why that was?
I reckon that those bad-ass C5's could give the Panoz a hard time, even.  
If it\'s good and fast, it won\'t be cheap. If it\'s fast and cheap, it won\'t be good. If it\'s good and cheap, it won\'t be fast.

Fax

  • Guest
Re:Panoz....
« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2004, 06:49:36 pm »
Hi Matt,
Perhaps they were trying to get as much lapping and data in on the new Michelin skins as possible.  That could explain the number of laps put in by the Vette guys.  Should be interesting when the new Panoz GTS contender comes on board the ALMS this summer.
John

Fax

  • Guest
Re:Panoz....
« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2004, 06:58:21 pm »
Or is it GT? Hmm..I'm a little confused about which class it will be eligible to compete in.
John