I think the whole programme had the subtext; "what a senseless and stupid race, isn't it terrible". Almost nothing about the race and an almost ghoulish emphasis on the death and injuries. The Dakar, almost from the outset, was an event where death was a distinct possibility, and not just for drivers. Anyone that went on the Dakar knew it, and had to accept that risk.
I just don't see the point of this "ain't it awful" approach. What were they trying to prove? They thoroughly missed the point... it is a challenge exactly BECAUSE it puts competitors in mortal danger. Setting aside the unfortunate incidents with locals being in the wrong place at the wrong time, if you remove the danger to competitors, you remove the heart of the event. You also devalue to achievement of the survivors who finished and dishonour those who didn't.
