NASCAR / France enterprises, have never properly understood sportscars or endurance racing. Despite running Grand AM for a decade they still don't get it. I noticed the website coverage had driver names on the live leader board rather than car the names of the cars. Le Mans and ALMS, is and was, primarily car focussed racing, not driver-centric like open wheel formulae and NASCAR. Ask any endurance fan who won Le Mans last year and you will get the name of the car not the drivers. TUSC have yet to work this out. Grand AM introduced the 'spec car' Daytona Prototype to make sure that the series didn't evolve into a GT only grid, but the DP is a phoney prototype and 40 years behind the technology of prototypes that run at Le Mans and in WSC. The year the DP cars first ran (2003) at Daytona the GTs were actually quicker and it was a GT that won overall (Racers Group Porsche 911 GT3-RS). That is indicative of how good that organization is at regulating a series. Grand AM has always been a bit of a buggers muddle as far as regulations are concerned, and the unholy mash-up of ALMS / ACO / Grand AM rules is confusion squared. Don't expect it to settle down either, it is likely continue to be a regular game of tweak and catch-up to aggravate the teams, with random last minute BOP changes.
You only have to compare this shambles with the ACO/WEC gradual evolution strategy to see just how wrong they are getting it.