The propensity of the ACO to disregard their own rules with total impunity doesn't really come as a shock to any of us, does it?
I thought the final safety car episode was ridiculous. Clearly both Audi and Aston Martin welcomed it from a tactical standpoint - and it made no real difference to Peugeot, because the R10 was out of range - I'm not so sure about the DBR-9 v C6R situation. Maybe an act of desperation on Fellows' part, but he was lapping some 30 secs faster than Brabham prior to safety car deployment, despite the deluge - and could, theoretically have caught him - so that part of the drama was denied us by the ACO. Rain only stops races in the States, remember!
At further risk of total partisan fanatiscism for all that is yellow and rumbly, The Corvettes 'extended pit-stop' in 2003 was not tactical from the teams point of view. Higher-ups in corporate GM demanded they sit idle so that the Caddy prototypes could catch-up - as it simply would not have done, to have the Vettes beat the Cadillacs.
Pratt & Miller now have some re-engineering to do, it would seem. Vibration caused by their MDS, whilst running behind the safety car caused the drive-shaft failure in #64 - this happened at St. Pete also, proving they are not infallable. Why Gavin wasn't allowed to limp it back on the starter motors did confuse me - I wonder if the same enforcement would have been applied to the Alphand car had it been in the same predicament......
I wonder if it's time to take some of the ballast out of the Corvette, on the back of this result?